|
Philo Farnsworth |
A
couple of years ago she told me that her teacher warned her students not
to trust Wikipedia without question because of inaccuracies. She instructed her students to double-check their
research. Smart teacher. The trouble was, at the time, I relied on
Wikipedia pretty heavily for my online research. I began looking and soon realized Maddie’s teacher was spot-on. I know if you take a second look, you’ll find conflicting information rampant on the Internet. So, who can you trust?
The
answer is you have to be careful. You have to take your time. Do your research online, then re-search again, either the old
fashioned way – at the library or in reference books; or by finding additional reliable
sources on the Internet. You’ll be glad
you did. The following article by certified
computer instructor Paul
Gil, contains the most complete
online research information I’ve ever found. I hope you'll take a look at it. I know you'll find helpful information and a few new tips that will aid in your quest to find reliable sources for research. The entire article is included below or can be found at About.com.
How
Proper Online Research Works
Legitimate methods, suggested techniques, good sense, and plenty of patience
By
Paul Gil, About.com Guide
Legitimate online research involves much more than 10 seconds with Google and copy-pasting the Wikipedia links. Legitimate research is called re-search for a reason: patient repetition, careful filtering, and the separation of drivel from verified content, all performed with a critical and skeptical mindset.
There are over 86 billion web pages published, and most of those pages are not worth quoting. To successfully sift it all, you must use consistent and reliable filtering methods. You will need patience to see the full breadth of writing on any single topic. And you will need your critical thinking skills to disbelieve anything until it is intelligently validated.
8 Steps to Researching Online
If you are a student, or if you are seeking serious medical,
professional, or historical information, definitely heed these 8 suggested
steps to researching online:
1. Decide if the Topic Is 'Hard Research', 'Soft Research', or
Both. 'Hard' and 'soft' research have different expectations of data and
proof. You should know the hard or soft nature of your topic to point
your search strategy where it will yield the most reliable research results.
A) 'Hard research' describes scientific and objective
research, where proven facts, figures, statistics, and measurable evidence are
absolutely critical. In hard research, the credibility of every resource must
be able to withstand intense scrutiny.
B) 'Soft research' describes topics that are more
subjective, cultural, and opinion-based. Soft research sources will be
less scrutinized by the readers.
C) Combined soft and
hard research requires
the most work, because this hybrid topic broadens your search
requirements. Not only do you need to find hard facts and figures, but
you will need to debate against very strong opinions to make your case.
Politics and international economy topics are the biggest examples of hybrid
research.
2. Choose Which Online Authorities Are Suitable for Your Research
Topic.
A) Soft research topics are often about collating the opinions
of respected online writers. Many soft research authorities are not
academics, but rather writers who have practical experience in their field.
Soft research usually means the following sources:
- Blogs, including personal opinion blogs and amateur writer blogs
(e.g. ConsumerReports).
- Forums and discussion sites (e.g. Police discussion forum)
- Consumer product review sites (e.g. ZDnet, Epinions).
- Commercial sites that are advertising-driven (e.g. About.com)
- Tech and computer sites (e.g.Overclock.net).
B) Hard research topics require hard facts and
academically-respected evidence. An opinion blog will not cut it; you
will need to find publications by scholars, experts, and professionals with
credentials. The Invisible Web will often be important for hard research.
Accordingly, here are possible content areas for your hard research topic:
- Academic journals (e.g. a list of academic search
engines here).
- Government publications (e.g. Google's 'Uncle Sam' search).
- Government authorities (e.g. the NHTSA)
- Scientific and medical content, sanctioned by known authorites
(e.g. Scirus.com).
- Non-government websites that are NOT influenced by advertising and
obvious sponsorship e.g. Consumer Watch)
- Archived news (e.g. Internet Archive)
3. Use Different Search Engines and Keywords
Now comes the primary legwork: using different search engines and
using 3-5 keyword combinations. Patient and constant adjusting of your keywords
are key here.
A) Start with broad initial
researching at Internet
Public Library, DuckDuckGo, Clusty/Yippy, Wikipedia, and Mahalo. This will give
you a broad sense of what categories and related topics are out there, and give
you possible directions to aim your research.
B) Narrow and deepen your Visible Web
searching with Google and Ask.com. Once you have experimented with
combinations of 3 to 5 different keywords, these 3 search engines will deepen
the results pools for your keywords.
C) Go beyond Google, for Invisble
Web (Deep Web) searching. Because Invisible Web pages are not spidered by
Google, you'll need to be patient and use slower and more specific search
engines like:
- Scirus (for scientific searching)
- Internet Archive (to backwards-search past current events)
- Advanced Clusty Searching (meta searching specific parts of
the Internet)
- Surfwax (much more knowledge-focused and much less commerce-driven
than Google)
- US Government Library of Congress
4. Bookmark and Stockpile Possible Good Content.
While this step is simple, this is the second-slowest part of the
whole process: this is where we gather all the possible ingredients into
organized piles, which we sift through later. Here is the suggested
routine for bookmarking pages:
- CTRL-Click the interesting search engine result links. This will
spawn a new tab page each time you CTRL-Click.
- When you have 3 or 4 new tabs, quickly browse them and do an
initial assessment on their credibility.
- Bookmark any tabs you consider credible on first glance.
- Close the tabs.
- Repeat with the next batch of links.
- This method, after about 45 minutes, will have yielded you dozens
of bookmarks to sift through.
5. Filter and Validate the Content.
This is the slowest step of all: vetting and filtering which
content is legitimate, and which is drivelous trash. If you are doing
hard research, this is also the most important step of all, because your
resources MUST withstand close examination later.
A) Carefully consider the author/source, and the date of
publication. Is the author an authority with
professional credentials, or someone who is peddling their wares and trying to
sell you a book? Is the page undated, or unusually old? Does the page
have its own domain name (e.g. honda.com, e.g. gov.co.uk), or is it some deep
and obscure page buried at MySpace?
B) Be suspicious of personal web pages, and any commercial pages that have a
shoddy, amateurish presentation. Spelling
errors, grammar errors, poor formatting, cheesy advertising on the side, absurd
fonts, too many blinking emoticons... these are all red flags that the author
is not a serious resource, and does not care about the quality of their
publishing.
C) Be suspicious of scientific or medical pages that display scientific or
medical advertising. For
example: if you are researching veterinarian advice, be wary if the
veterinarian web page displays blatant advertising for dog medicine or pet
food. Advertising can possibly indicate a conflict of interest or hidden
agenda behind the writer's content.
D) Be suspicious of any ranting, overstating, overly-positive, or
overly-negative commentary. If the author insists on ranting and
crying foul, or conversely seems to shower excessive praise, that could be a
red flag that there is dishonesty and fraudulent motivations behind the writing.
E) Commercial consumer websites can be good resources, but be skeptical of
every comment you read. Just because 7 people rave that Pet Food X is
good for their dogs does not necessarily mean it is good for your dog.
Similarly, if 5 people out of 600 complain about a particular vendor, that
doesn't mean the vendor is necessarily bad. Be patient, be skeptical, and be
slow to form an opinion.
F) Use your intuition if something seems amiss with the web page.
Perhaps the author is just a little too positive, or seems a little too closed
to other opinions. Maybe the author uses profanity, name-calling, or
insults to try to make his point. The formatting of the page might seem
childlike and haphazard. Or you get the sense that the author is trying
to sell you something. If you get any subconcious sense that there is
something not quite right about the web page, then trust your intuition.
G) Use Google 'link:' feature to see the 'backlinks' for a page. This technique will list incoming
hyperlinks from the major websites that recommend the web page of interest.
These backlinks will give you an indicator how much respect the author has
earned around the Internet. Simply go to google and enter 'link:www.(the
web page's address)' to see the backlinks listed.
6. Make a Final Decision on Which Argument You Now Support.
After spending a few hours researching, your initial opinion may
have changed. Maybe you are relieved, maybe you are more afraid, maybe
you've just learned something and opened your mind that much more.
Whichever it is, you will need to have an informed opinion if you are about to
publish a report or thesis for your professor.
If you have a new opinion, you might have to redo your research (or re-sift your existing research bookmarks) in order to
collate facts that support your new opinion and thesis statement.
7. Quote and Cite the Content.
While there is not a single universal standard for citing
(acknowledging) quotes from the Internet, the Modern Language Association
and American Psychological Association are two very respected citing methods:
Sample MLA citation:
Aristotle. Poetics. Trans. S. H. Butcher. The
Internet Classics Archive.
Web Atomic and Massachusetts Institute of Technology,
13 Sept. 2007. Web. 4 Nov. 2008. ‹http://classics.mit.edu/›.
Sample APA citation:Bernstein, M. (2002). 10 tips on writing the
living Web. AList Apart: For People Who Make Websites, 149.
Retrieved from http://www.alistapart.com/articles/writeliving
More details: The Purdue University Owl Guide explains both of
these citing methods in detail:
Remember: DO NOT PLAGIARIZE. You must either directly quote
the author, or rewrite and summarize the content (along with appropriate
citing). But to restate the author's words as your own is illegal, and
will get you a failing mark on your thesis or paper.
8. Choose a Research-Friendly Web Browser
Researching is repetitive and slow. You will want a tool
that supports many open pages, and easily backtracks through previous
pages. A good research-friendly Web browser offers:
- Multiple tab pages open simultaneously.
- Bookmarks/favorites that are fast and easy to manage.
- Page history that is easy to recall.
- Loads pages quickly for your computer's memory size.
- Of the many choices in 2013, the best research browsers are Chrome and Firefox, followed by Opera. IE10 is also a competent browser,
but try the previous 3 choices for their speed and memory economy.
Paul Gil is a professional project manager and a
certified computer instructor. Based out of Canada, Paul has traveled around North
America to
give technical training to adult learners. Paul is renowned for his
dynamic Internet, project management, and database courses.